Understanding voluntary departure and removal proceedings is crucial for green card holders facing legal challenges in the United States. These processes significantly affect your residency status and require a clear understanding to protect your rights. Knowing the differences between them helps you make informed decisions during legal proceedings. This blog will explore voluntary departure and removal proceedings and their impact on your green card status. It will also explain the steps you can take to protect yourself.
Voluntary departure is an option for green card holders or other noncitizens facing removal from the United States. It allows individuals to leave the country voluntarily rather than being formally removed by immigration authorities. Voluntary departure is typically offered to individuals willing to leave the US on their own accord and meet certain conditions.
Removal proceedings are the legal process by which the US government seeks to remove a noncitizen from the country formally. These proceedings take place in immigration court and include a hearing before an immigration judge. The judge determines if the individual should be removed or allowed to remain in the United States.
Aspect | Voluntary Departure | Removal Proceedings |
Nature of Departure | Voluntary, initiated by the individual | Involuntary, ordered by an immigration judge |
Impact on Record | No formal removal order | Results in a formal removal order |
Future Reentry | Easier to apply for reentry in the future | Formal bars to reentry for several years |
Legal Consequences | Less severe impact on immigration status | Significant impact on immigration status |
The choice between voluntary departure and facing removal proceedings depends on your circumstances and the strength of your case. Here are some factors to consider when deciding how to proceed:
Consider the example of David, a green card holder from Nigeria facing voluntary departure vs removal proceedings after an extended absence from the United States. David had been living in Nigeria for over a year due to family obligations, and upon his return, immigration authorities questioned whether he had abandoned his US residency.
David received a Notice to Appear (NTA) and was scheduled for removal proceedings. After consulting with an immigration attorney, David learned that his case for retaining his green card was weak due to his prolonged absence and lack of strong ties to the United States. Rather than risk a formal removal order and a lengthy bar to reentry, David chose to take voluntary departure. By doing so, David avoided a formal removal order and maintained the possibility of applying for a visa to return to the United States.
If you decide that voluntary departure is the best option for you, here are the steps you need to follow:
Understanding the difference between voluntary departure vs removal proceedings is crucial for green card holders facing legal challenges in the United States. Voluntary departure can provide a less severe alternative to formal removal, allowing you to leave the country without the long-term consequences of a removal order. However, the decision to take voluntary departure or fight the removal proceedings depends on your circumstances, your case’s strength, and future immigration plans. If you are facing removal, consult with an experienced immigration attorney to understand your options and make the best decision for your situation.
Are you facing removal proceedings or considering voluntary departure? Contact Law Offices of Osas Iyamu, LLC for Immigration legal guidance on protecting your residency and making informed decisions during this challenging time!
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Always consult with a qualified immigration attorney regarding your specific situation.